How Fauci Fooled America | Opinion

 

【30秒重點】

  • 已經感染過新冠的人,評估要不要再打疫苗時,可以和醫師討論天然免疫。
  • 哈佛的Martin Kulldorff和史丹佛的Jay Bhattacharya批評福奇推動疫苗強制令,卻忽略天然免疫。
  • 他們說美國有超過4500萬人感染康復,越來越多證據顯示天然免疫比疫苗免疫更強、更持久。
  • 編輯註明長期趨勢仍不清楚,也有研究得到相反結論。

2021/12/21

好文:How Fauci Fooled America | Opinion 

作者:

Martin Kulldorff, Ph.D., is an epidemiologist, biostatistician, and Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School. Jay Bhattacharya, MD, Ph.D., is a Professor of Health Policy at Stanford University School of Medicine. Both are Senior Scholars at the newly formed Brownstone Institute.

全文有完整科學論證。以下只貼天然免疫部分。

Natural immunity. By pushing vaccine mandates, Dr. Fauci ignores naturally acquired immunity among the COVID-recovered, of which there are more than 45 million in the United States. Mounting evidence indicates that natural immunity is stronger and longer lasting than vaccine-induced immunity. [Eds.: Long-term trends are still unclear. A recent study reached the opposite conclusion, but was criticized by an author of this op-ed.] In a study from Israel, the vaccinated were 27 times more likely to get symptomatic COVID than the unvaccinated who had recovered from a prior infection.

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

為何要額外補充輔酶 Q10?自討苦吃

Grok推出新功能:SuperGrok (Tasks 與 Workspaces)

心臟病根源不只膽固醇!醫生忽略的十一項你中了幾項?